SLP: Counter Opinion : Some More Points To Add : Part Second

Dear Friends,

                 This is the second and last part of the letter written by one of the readers and victims named ‘Meera’. Please the first part of the
letter to get an idea. Click on the following link to read the first part.

                   SLP :Counter Opinion : Some More Points To Add : Part First

I again mention that the views and opinions expressed through the letter are purely of the writer ‘Meera’. I have posted the letter as it is. I am thankful to her for her contribution. I would like to invite all of you
to express your views,
opinions and suggestions. Feel free to write me at askyuvi2012@gmail.com.

Regards,

Yuvi

A Letter written by ‘Meera’ : Second Part

Dear Friend,

        In the result notification it is said that 

1. The Commission shall not be responsible for any technical/typographical error of any kind for this notification. The decision of the Commission in all matters of dispute shall be final.

2. UGC takes utmost care in finalisation of result. However, if any error is detected at a later stage, UGC may rectify the result accordingly.

In the 2nd point they said they are not responsible for any error of any kind for this notification.  Then what is purpose of the notification.  What is its validity, who will take the responsibility is it the UGC or the candidates.

In the 5th point they said they take utmost care in finalisation of result. Even if any error is detected at a later stage, they will correct it.  They have not corrected it even I have mailed and not yet replied for the mail.

An error is one that which can be found out by themselves or others. If an error is found out by candidates it is the responsibility of UGC to go through and correct it.  

In the SC/ST/PWD candidates category they have not corrected the mistake of 55% aggregate which is imaginary and one can not achieve exactly 55%. 55% in aggregate means out of 350 it is 192.5 marks.  

In the application notification of June 2012 it is stated that for OBC(Non-creamy layer) 

Paper I - 35 (35%) 

Paper II - 35 (35%) 

Paper III - 67.5 (45 %) rounded off to 68

They have to obtain the above minimum marks to consider for final preparation of result. If the 67.5 mark can be rounded off to 68 marks for Paper III in their notification. Then they have to correct the mistake for the SC/ST/PWD candidates who obtain 192 marks must be declared passed/cleared NET June 2012.

Rule must be applicable to all, irrespective of whether it is an Institution or an Individual.

The 0.5 marks to be reduced for SC/ST/PWD candidates and they have declare those who possess 192 marks in aggregate in this category as passed/cleared NET June 2012.

One among their argument is that they have fixed the final criteria with an expert committee.  It shows 'the expertness' in fixing the final criteria for SC/ST/OBC, even if the arguments of UGC is accepted.

Regards,
Meera