Dear Tej, Of course, good things take its own times. It's better to be late with full and perfect victory than to end sooner with half victory. Thank you. Regards. Yuvi
Respected Sir I Mr. Ajay Ashok Nikam kindly ask for proper guidance about 24 JUNE 2012 ugc net supreme court case, My Seat No. is 19880001 in june 2012 Net exam, and i score 1st Paper : 56 : 56% 2nd Paper : 52 : 52% 3rd Paper : 68 : 45.33% As per minimum criteria can i get certificate. (I fill form in OBC) Only those student who fill case in supreme court will get the result. Please guide me for the same Thanking you..................
Dear Ajay, Firstly, read the original notification of June 2012 exam. again and carefully and check whether you are eligible according to old criteria or not. Secondly, you will also get certificate as other will receive if UGC loses case in Supreme court because UGC has to revise result and publish it newly on its website. Even though some students have filed petition against UGC's move, UGC can not issue certificates to petitioners only as in the case of Kerala High Court single bench, Supreme Court had ordered UGC to apply the verdict to non petitioners too. Read my all articles. Your doubts will be clarified. If you meet the criteria, be relaxed and prepare for Interview. I promise you soon you will receive certificate. Feel free to ask me anything. Thank you. Regards, Yuvi
Dear Dhananjay, Intervention appeal is a procedure used in a lawsuit by which the court allows a third person who was not originally a party to the suit to become a party, by joining with either the plaintiff or the defendant. Intervention arises when the intervenor, the person who seeks to become a party to an existing lawsuit, can satisfactorily show that his or her interest is not adequately represented by the present parties, that the interest relates to the subject of the action, and that the disposition of the action might in some way impair his or her ability to protect such interest. FOR MORE CLARIFICATION, READ MY PREVIOUS POSTS IN ARCHIVES. Regards, Yuvi
As per old criteria i score minimum marks i.e. if supreme court result is in favour of us then i get certificate. But how to conform that my seat no. is present in that list.
Respected Sir I Mr.Utekar Prabhat Pandurabg kindly ask for proper guidance about 24 JUNE 2012 ugc net supreme court case, My Seat No. is 5059732 in june 2012 Net exam, and i score 1st Paper : 46 : 46% 2nd Paper : 48 : 48% 3rd Paper : 94 : 68% As per minimum criteria can i get certificate. (I fill form in open) Only those student who fill case in supreme court will get the result. Please guide me for the same Thanking you..................
Dear Prabhat, Firstly, read the original notification of June 2012 exam. again and carefully and check whether you are eligible according to old criteria or not. If you meet criteria, you will receive certificate. Please read my old posts where you will get information regarding criteria. Regards, Yuvi
Dear Ajay, Of Course, you will get certificate. As far as confirming the seat no. is concerned, I can not comment it now. You have to wait for some more days. Regards, Yuvi
Do not wait for high court verdict as it no any value after the verdict of SC. No any high court will announce the verdict while the case for the same matter is pending in Supreme court.
Rules can’t be introduced just before exam results: HC DC | Shashiprasad S.M. | 04th Aug 2013 ,Deccan Chronicle inShare Printer-friendly version Send by email
Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has held that regulations cannot be introduced at the fag end of an examination process or just before or at the time of announcement of results.
The court passed the order while quashing the category-wise qualifying criteria for eligibility for lecturers’ posts for the UGC NET last year.
Justice Ashok B. Hinchigeri passed the order recently, while allowing two petitions challenging action by the University Grants Commission, which had changed the eligibility criteria for general category candidates at the time of announcing the results for exams held in June 2012.
A 36-year-old lecturer and an advocate, postgraduates in law from Mysore University, had appeared for the National Eligibility Test (NET) for the junior research fellowship and lecturer posts.
The eligibility criteria for the post of lectureship for the candidates from general category was initially set at 40% in paper-I, 40% in paper-II and 50% in paper-III. As per the notification issued by the UGC NET Bureau, both the petitioners had obtained the minimum qualifying percentage in all the three papers.
But the NET Bureau, at the time of announcing the results, raised the minimum qualifying percentage to aggregate 65 for the candidates from general category, prompting the two petitioners to approach the court.
The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the terms and conditions at the time of calling for the applications govern the entire process of the test, including the fixing of the minimum marks and the announcement of results.
“Midway, the minimum qualifying percentage cannot be varied to the disadvantage of the candidates,” the advocate argued, placing before the court an order of the Kerala High Court quashing the upward revision of minimum qualifying percentage.
The court ordered: “The aggregate 65 as minimum qualifying percentage is quashed. It is declared that the petitioners have acquired the eligibility criteria for lectureship, if they have indeed secured 40 per cent in paper – I, 40 per cent in paper – II and 50 per cent in paper – III or more.” The court also directed the UGC to issue the eligibility certificate to the petitioners before August 16. States:
No any impact over UGC of this verdict till the case is pending in SC so wait and pray for the verdict will be announced by SC instead of giving next hearing.
Dear Prabhat I am surprised we were waiting for the verdict and got the next date of hearing is so late. Can you please brief what happened in the court today.
is this going to reach any end?
ReplyDeleteDear Tej,
ReplyDeleteOf course, good things take its own times. It's better to be late with full and perfect victory than to end sooner with half victory. Thank you.
Regards.
Yuvi
Respected Sir
ReplyDeleteI Mr. Ajay Ashok Nikam kindly ask for proper guidance about 24 JUNE 2012 ugc net supreme court case, My Seat No. is 19880001 in june 2012 Net exam, and i score
1st Paper : 56 : 56%
2nd Paper : 52 : 52%
3rd Paper : 68 : 45.33%
As per minimum criteria can i get certificate. (I fill form in OBC)
Only those student who fill case in supreme court will get the result. Please guide me for the same
Thanking you..................
THIS IS LAST HEARING
ReplyDeleteDear Ajay,
ReplyDeleteFirstly, read the original notification of June 2012 exam. again and carefully and check whether you are eligible according to old criteria or not. Secondly, you will also get certificate as other will receive if UGC loses case in Supreme court because UGC has to revise result and publish it newly on its website. Even though some students have filed petition against UGC's move, UGC can not issue certificates to petitioners only as in the case of Kerala High Court single bench, Supreme Court had ordered UGC to apply the verdict to non petitioners too. Read my all articles. Your doubts will be clarified. If you meet the criteria, be relaxed and prepare for Interview. I promise you soon you will receive certificate. Feel free to ask me anything. Thank you.
Regards,
Yuvi
Dear Prabhat,
ReplyDeleteI did not get your point. Whether is this your statement or question? The next hearing is on 12th August, 2013. Thank you.
Regards,
Yuvi
Is there any end to this, everytime the hearing getting delayed
ReplyDeleteDear Jaya,
ReplyDeleteI have answered the same question above. For more information, read my archives carefully.
Regards,
Yuvi
SIR,
ReplyDeleteWHAT DO U MEAN BY INTERVENTATION AS U EXPLAIN IN LAST TIME.
yuvi,thank u for ur guidance.
ReplyDeletei know we are 100% win,but when? 2 - 3 month or more?
plz. tell me ur view on it.
Dear Sagar,
ReplyDeleteI think within 3 months. Good Luck.
Regards,
Yuvi
Dear Dhananjay,
ReplyDeleteIntervention appeal is a procedure used in a lawsuit by which the court allows a third person who was not originally a party to the suit to become a party, by joining with either the plaintiff or the defendant. Intervention arises when the intervenor, the person who seeks to become a party to an existing lawsuit, can satisfactorily show that his or her interest is not adequately represented by the present parties, that the interest relates to the subject of the action, and that the disposition of the action might in some way impair his or her ability to protect such interest.
FOR MORE CLARIFICATION, READ MY PREVIOUS POSTS IN ARCHIVES.
Regards,
Yuvi
does it mean anyone who suffers can become intervene in intervention appeal? please reply.
ReplyDeleteRespected sir
ReplyDeleteAs per old criteria i score minimum marks i.e. if supreme court result is in favour of us then i get certificate.
But how to conform that my seat no. is present in that list.
Respected Sir
ReplyDeleteI Mr.Utekar Prabhat Pandurabg kindly ask for proper guidance about 24 JUNE 2012 ugc net supreme court case, My Seat No. is 5059732 in june 2012 Net exam, and i score
1st Paper : 46 : 46%
2nd Paper : 48 : 48%
3rd Paper : 94 : 68%
As per minimum criteria can i get certificate. (I fill form in open)
Only those student who fill case in supreme court will get the result. Please guide me for the same
Thanking you..................
Dear Prabhat,
DeleteFirstly, read the original notification of June 2012 exam. again and carefully and check whether you are eligible according to old criteria or not. If you meet criteria, you will receive certificate. Please read my old posts where you will get information regarding criteria.
Regards,
Yuvi
Dear Ajay,
ReplyDeleteOf Course, you will get certificate. As far as confirming the seat no. is concerned, I can not comment it now. You have to wait for some more days.
Regards,
Yuvi
Dear Dhananjay,
ReplyDeleteIt's natural that anyone who suffers may file intervention petition as some non-petitioners have already filed.
Regards,
Yuvi
Do not wait for high court verdict as it no any value after the verdict of SC. No any high court will announce the verdict while the case for the same matter is pending in Supreme court.
ReplyDeleteRegards
Subodh
Rules can’t be introduced just before exam results: HC
ReplyDeleteDC | Shashiprasad S.M. | 04th Aug 2013 ,Deccan Chronicle
inShare
Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has held that regulations cannot be introduced at the fag end of an examination process or just before or at the time of announcement of results.
The court passed the order while quashing the category-wise qualifying criteria for eligibility for lecturers’ posts for the UGC NET last year.
Justice Ashok B. Hinchigeri passed the order recently, while allowing two petitions challenging action by the University Grants Commission, which had changed the eligibility criteria for general category candidates at the time of announcing the results for exams held in June 2012.
A 36-year-old lecturer and an advocate, postgraduates in law from Mysore University, had appeared for the National Eligibility Test (NET) for the junior research fellowship and lecturer posts.
The eligibility criteria for the post of lectureship for the candidates from general category was initially set at 40% in paper-I, 40% in paper-II and 50% in paper-III. As per the notification issued by the UGC NET Bureau, both the petitioners had obtained the minimum qualifying percentage in all the three papers.
But the NET Bureau, at the time of announcing the results, raised the minimum qualifying percentage to aggregate 65 for the candidates from general category, prompting the two petitioners to approach the court.
The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the terms and conditions at the time of calling for the applications govern the entire process of the test, including the fixing of the minimum marks and the announcement of results.
“Midway, the minimum qualifying percentage cannot be varied to the disadvantage of the candidates,” the advocate argued, placing before the court an order of the Kerala High Court quashing the upward revision of minimum qualifying percentage.
The court ordered: “The aggregate 65 as minimum qualifying percentage is quashed. It is declared that the petitioners have acquired the eligibility criteria for lectureship, if they have indeed secured 40 per cent in paper – I, 40 per cent in paper – II and 50 per cent in paper – III or more.” The court also directed the UGC to issue the eligibility certificate to the petitioners before August 16.
States:
No any impact over UGC of this verdict till the case is pending in SC so wait and pray for the verdict will be announced by SC instead of giving next hearing.
ReplyDeleteTomorrow as soon as you get the supreme court case update please inform us on this page
ReplyDeletehumlogoki jit hogi, insallah
ReplyDeletePlease update as soon as the SC conclude this case tomorrow.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Balaji raghavan.
Yuvi please update the supreme court case status continuously.
ReplyDeleteYuvi please update what is going on in Supreme Court.
ReplyDeleteDear
ReplyDeleteSubodh
Next hearing 30/9/2013
Dear Prabhat I am surprised we were waiting for the verdict and got the next date of hearing is so late. Can you please brief what happened in the court today.
ReplyDeletesir what happened in sc today
ReplyDeleteSir, any information about the SC order today. Please update us.
ReplyDelete