Tuesday, 30 April 2013

UGC Cannot Move in SC against Nagpur High Court Verdict

Dear Students,
                      The lawyer of the UGC had asked the honourable judges in the court that UGC should be allowed to file petition for stay order against the verdict of Nagpur High Court's verdict in Supreme Court. But in a major move, the Honourable judges of Nagpur High Court have rejected it and ordered UGC to issue NET certificates with in 8 weeks. But this judgement is applicable to the petitioners only. If the advocates of petitioners appeal to SC that under Article 32, this judgement should be applicable to all as it has already happened in case of Kerala High Court verdict, then some positive things may take place. Wait and see what happens. Another crucial judgment of Kerala High Court Division bench is awaited. Happy Labour Day.
Regards,
Mr. Mahajan
Nagpur.

10 comments:

  1. Dear Mahajan sir, I applied for NET JUNE 2012 too so asking this question. As you said that the decision is valid for petitioners only , dont you thing it should be valid for all the students by default who appeared and are passed according to the previous criteria. Also if you can let me know if what should be done in case the advocates dont take care of students apart from the petitioners , what should be the steps taken for the same.
    your efforts are appreciated for posting the latest updates about the same. thank you so much.... ------ ASHISH BEDMUTHA NASHIK

    ReplyDelete
  2. What we should do is to stay ugc net exam till the verdict comes

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Mr. Mahajan,
    Thanks for efforts done by you and your team. My request is that it should be applicable to all who appeared in June 2012 NET exam, not only to petitioners. Please guide me how can I will be benefited as I am not in the list of petitioners. Regards. Vijay

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Mahajan sir there are thousands of students who have been affected by the ugc net result June 2012, and as the verdict of NHC has come which would give relief only to the petitioners, I request you to extend your valuable suggestions for non-petitioners in order to get the same relief. Awaiting for your reply......

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dear Mr.Mahajan Sir,
    I am also NET affected student but I am not petitioner, so please guide me how can this verdict is applicable to all affected students. Prof. Vikrant Palatshah Mob. No. 9175532913

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "The lawyer of the UGC had asked the honourable judges in the court that UGC should be allowed to file petition for stay order against the verdict of Nagpur High Court's verdict in Supreme Court." This is not right. Advocate Mishra requested to stay the order of the same court for some time for getting enough time to move the matter in to SC. The order contained an action to be executed (issue of certificate) and thus to not to take the preparation for that action, a stay was required to UGC. But the court rejected to stay its own order for benefit of UGC. Only stay appeal is rejected. Not the power/right of UGC to move SC. They have to approach SC at a sudden because of rejection of stay. Yet by virtue of this appeal to stay, UGC got a benefit. Instead of normal one month , the court prolonged the period to 8 weeks or 2 months

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dear Friends,
    I would like to inform you on 12th and 13th JUNE 2013, from all over India students are coming Delhi to protest at UGC head office. Kindly support and join us to make is successful. This is the only last and final way to get solution. I hope you must have understood the role of Indian Judiciary in last 10 months. Kindly spread this information to your friends. Come to Delhi and build pressure on UGC to announce revise old cut-off result of UGC-NET June 2012.

    Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks for launching agitation against the ugcnet.

    ReplyDelete

Featured post

hi